What if a balloon corp. decided funding for the Wright brothers’ R&D proposals?

An insightful Rick Hess blog on the potential for federal government funding of true innovation in education: ARPA-ED: A Qualified Thumbs-Up – Rick Hess Straight Up – Education Week.

As usual Rick reports out the risks not just the promise. Working at a digital content innovator turned down twice by i3 reviewers (U.S. Education Department’s “Investing In Innovation” competitive grants program), it is clearly evident to me that the incumbent education establishment is not open to “breakthrough capabilities” or even “fresh thinking and ideas”. It is as if those reviewing a potential breakthrough aviation project, like stealth technology, already have strong beliefs on what will or won’t work, if not their own competitive stealth projects underway. Selection of ARPA-ED projects to be funded: applicant eligibility, who evaluates project proposals, on what basis, and under what oversight, will be a make-or-break. Just allowing the path-of-least-resistance and least-political-risk of incumbent status-quo thinking will *not* generate education game-changers.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: